An action plan to prepare for the dire effects of natural disasters gathered dust for 18 months in the run-up to the current catastrophic bushfires.

The recent catastrophic bushfires have led to 26 deaths, destroyed thousands of homes and burnt through about 10 million hectares of bush. Bushfire-related insurance losses for the season stand at almost $1 billion. More than a billion animals may have been killed, wounded or displaced by the fires.
The government framework laid out a blueprint for a nationally co-ordinated pre-emptive response to the known risks, including increased investment in resilience projects, more research on the nature of risks, a clear accountability regime and a national implementation plan to be published last year.
Weve got to get out of the habit of living in ignorance of whats possible.
Mark Crossweller, former Home Affairs public servant
Mark Crosweller, the former Home Affairs public servant who led the work on the National Disaster Risk Reduction Framework, told AFR Weekend the changing climate required a radical rethink in the way Australians interact with the land, and demanded “compassionate politics”.
Public policy on climate change at all levels of government has been confusing and difficult and there have been no clear policy signals, he said.
We cannot rely on historical experience to anticipate future impacts.
Mr Crosweller said it had been impossible to get proposals adopted so that significant work can be done in preparation and mitigation.
Theres still a big gap within the context of existing leadership capability. We need a step-change in addressing climate change in the future.
“Weve got to get out of the habit of living in ignorance of whats possible.”
The government ignored its own blueprint for a nationally co-ordinated pre-emptive response to known risks. Wolter Peeters
He said it was a complex issue that needs a very skilful narrative and a very compassionate politics.
“We’ve got to sit down with people and discuss what are we prepared to lose and what are we not prepared to lose. Because the reality is we will lose things, and nobody wants to talk about that. But that is the reality of living in the Australian landscape.”
Resources and forums
Asked what steps had been taken to implement the framework, a spokesman for the Department of Home Affairs said it had “published resources” and “held forums”, but gave no examples of concrete initiatives other than one “pilot project” in the freight sector.
The spokesman said the government was “working with states and territories, as well as industry and the community sector, on a national action plan that sets out specific actions to implement the framework”.
He did not say when that plan would be published.
The spokesman also referred to government programs and investments that were in line with the framework. This could have referred to a 2019 federal budget measure that put aside $130.5 million over five years to fund disaster reduction initiatives.
Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton’s office did not respond to calls.
Recovery commitment
The federal government has committed $2 billion to the bushfire recovery effort, while the NSW government has committed $1 billion.
According to the Australian Business Roundtable for Disaster Resilience and Safer Communities a joint venture of IAG, Westpac, Optus, Munich Re and Australian Red Cross government spending on disaster recovery dwarfs spending on resilience projects.
It found that between 2010 and 2013, federal and state governments spent about $2.7 billion a year on recovery, but just $100 million on resilience.
Optus chairman Paul O’Sullivan, one of the five board members of the roundtable, said it was time for a “step change” in the way nations prepared for natural disasters.
He said the onus was on communities and businesses as well as governments to force the change.
“Historically it’s been very hard for people to see the benefits of disasters that have been avoided, whereas spending money to recover is a lot more tangible and visible,” he said.
“So its an issue for the community, and for us as business leaders. There needs to be more forceful recognition from businesses, communities and governments of the benefit of resilience, even though it wont be as politically appealing.”