Any senator who votes to hear witnesses is playing into Democrats’ hands.

In October, the House subpoenaed deputy national security adviser Charles Kupperman to testify in the impeachment investigation. After the White House invoked immunity to preclude Kuppermans testimony, he filed a lawsuit to ask the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to resolve the conflict between the two branches of government. John Boltons counsel publicly resolved to be guided by the courts ruling in Kuppermans case.
The latest Trump impeachment trial updates
But before the court could hear arguments, House Democrats short-circuited the judicial review. On Nov. 6, they withdrew Kuppermans subpoena, and then asked the court to declare Kuppermans case moot which would prevent a decision on the merits. On Dec. 30, U.S. District Judge Richard Leon did so. In his memorandum, he noted that balancing Congresss well-established power to investigate with a Presidents need to have a small group of national security advisers who have some form of immunity from compelled Congressional testimony was a serious dilemma that the courts would eventually need to resolve.
Leon was unable to resolve that dilemma because House Democrats actively prevented him from doing so. As White House Deputy Counsel Patrick F. Philbin explained to the Senate on Wednesday, House Democrats were going to get a decision that would go to the merits of the issue. The House managers withdrew the subpoena. The House of Representatives decided they wanted to moot out the case so they wouldnt get a decision.
Why did Democrats prevent the court from ruling on the merits of the presidents claim of executive privilege? Because the ruling could have undermined their impeachment case. On Dec. 18, the House passed two articles of impeachment, one of which charged President Trump with obstruction of Congress for refusing to provide witnesses and documents. Imagine if the court then ruled just days later that the presidents claim of executive privilege was valid. It would have destroyed the Democrats case for obstruction. To prevent that from happening, they decided to block judicial review and then impeached the president for seeking the very judicial review that they had stymied!
Then, after preventing the court from ruling on whether the president could order his top aides not to testify, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) announced that she was holding back the articles of impeachment as leverage to force the Senate to call those witnesses. Her goal was transparently political: to force this weeks sham witness fight so that Democrats either could charge Senate Republicans with voting for a coverup or saddle them with months of litigation over executive privilege that the House prevented the court from settling.
This episode proves that the push for witnesses is not an honest search for truth, but a dishonest political power play one that was planned from the very start of the impeachment process. Not only are House Democrats using impeachment as a political weapon against the president; they also are using it as a political weapon against Senate Republicans as well.
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) revealed that when she asked the House impeachment managers why the House didnt reissue subpoenas after passing the resolution authorizing the impeachment inquiry and granting subpoena power to the Intelligence and Judiciary committees; the House managers dismissed her question as a red herring. No, it is not. It further exposed that the Houses demand for the Senate to call witnesses is a political ploy.
Democrats did not want to resolve questions of executive privilege before the Senate trial, because they want to create a spectacle in the Senate. They want the visual of the presidents defense team objecting to allowing Bolton to answer specific questions on the grounds that they would divulge privileged information. They want to force Republican senators to vote to sustain those objections, or even overrule Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. on matters of executive privilege. They want to turn the Senate into a political circus.
Why would Senate Republicans go along with this scam? Why would they allow House Democrats to stick them with a legal mess that Schiff and Pelosi intentionally created? If House managers want to hear from Bolton, they can subpoena him to appear in the House. But if senators vote to hear witnesses, they are not being noble. They are not aiding the search for truth. They are playing right into the Democrats hands.
Read more:
Marc A. Thiessen: Senate Republicans will set a dangerous precedent if they vote to hear from Bolton
Jennifer Rubin: John Bolton, its now or never
Greg Sargent: GOP senators know Trumps defense is based on lies. Heres proof.
Jonathan Capehart: Schumer on Republicans and impeachment witnesses:They realize were right
Whats next in the impeachment trial