A flood of captivating new details surrounding President Trump’s dealings with Ukraine…

A flood of captivating new details surrounding President TrumpDonald John TrumpDem lawmaker says Nunes threatened to sue him over criticism Parnas: U.S. ambassador to Ukraine removed to clear path for investigations into BidensFive takeaways from Parnas’s Maddow interviewMORE’s dealings with Ukraine has spilled out into public just as the Senate begins the impeachment trial, putting fresh pressure on GOP leaders to consider witnesses and new documents.
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) on Thursday issued a stunning report, accusing the White House budget office of breaking the law by withholding military aid to Ukraine the very issue at the heart of the Democrats’ impeachment effort.
Separately, a close associate of Rudy GiulianiRudy GiulianiDem lawmaker says Nunes threatened to sue him over criticism Parnas: U.S. ambassador to Ukraine removed to clear path for investigations into BidensFive takeaways from Parnas’s Maddow interviewMORE, Trumps personal lawyer, has delivered a trove of information to House Democrats related to Giulianis campaign to pressure Ukrainian leaders to find dirt on the presidents political rivals. Lev Parnas, a Soviet-born Florida businessman facing unrelated campaign-finance charges in New York, is also making the media rounds to deliver a damning message: Trump, he says, was privy to the pressure campaign from the start.
Every day new incriminating evidence comes forward, Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOn The Money Presented by Wells Fargo Trump signs first phase of US-China trade deal | Senate to vote Thursday on Canada, Mexico deal | IRS provides relief for those with discharged student loansHouse delivers impeachment articles to SenateSenate begins preparations for Trump trialMORE (D-Calif.) said Thursday at a press conference in the Capitol. I think that only speaks very clearly to the need for the Senate to enter the documentation into their discussion.”
The developments came just before the Senate accepted the two impeachment articles from House Democrats, who presented the charges on the Senate floor Thursday afternoon. The House passed the resolutions on Dec. 18, charging Trump with abusing his power in dangling military aid to secure political favors from Kyiv, then obstructing Congress as Democrats sought to investigate the matter.
Trump and his GOP allies have denied any wrongdoing, arguing the administration was simply ensuring that U.S. tax dollars were not frittered in a country long known for corruption. Behind Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellNew Parnas evidence escalates impeachment witnesses fightOn The Money Presented by Wells Fargo Trump signs first phase of US-China trade deal | Senate to vote Thursday on Canada, Mexico deal | IRS provides relief for those with discharged student loansGOP senator: 2020 candidates must recuse themselves from impeachment trialMORE (R-Ky.), GOP leaders have resisted the consideration of new evidence or witnesses in the trial phase, arguing the entire impeachment effort is merely a political scheme to hurt Trumps reelection prospects in November.
“If the existing case is strong, there’s no need for the judge and the jury to reopen the investigation, McConnell said this week. If the existing case is weak, House Democrats should not have impeached in the first place.”
Yet the GAO, an independent government watchdog, found that the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB) withheld the appropriated funds last summer — not as a programmatic delay but in order to advance the presidents own agenda, which violates a law that governs Congress’s role in the federal budget process.
Faithful execution of the law does not permit the President to substitute his own policy priorities for those that Congress has enacted into law, the report says. OMB withheld funds for a policy reason, which is not permitted under the Impoundment Control Act (ICA). … Therefore, we conclude that OMB violated the ICA.
At a press conference in the Capitol Thursday, Pelosi read from the GAO report, then offered her own vernacular translation.
“The OMB, the White House, the administration broke I’m saying this broke the law, she said. This reinforces, again, the need for documents and eye-witnesses in the Senate.”
The GAO report came on the heels of Parnas telling MSNBCs Rachel MaddowRachel Anne MaddowDem lawmaker says Nunes threatened to sue him over criticism Parnas: U.S. ambassador to Ukraine removed to clear path for investigations into BidensFive takeaways from Parnas’s Maddow interviewMORE on Wednesday night that Trump was aware of a scheme to both seek the removal of U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch and to create conditions to push Ukraines new president to announce investigations into former Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden in order to help Trumps 2020 reelection prospects.
House Democrats are seizing on the new developments to aid their calls for the Senate to provide a fair trial, which they say is contingent on being able to review new evidence and receive testimony from additional witnesses.
The additional documents and information about potential witnesses that have become available over the last several weeks only underscore the importance of a fair trial and a Senate that is open to hearing all of the evidence, said House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffAdam Schiff was an answer on ‘Jeopardy!’ and none of the contestants knew who he wasHillicon Valley: Trump turns up heat on Apple over gunman’s phone | Mnuchin says Huawei won’t be ‘chess piece’ in trade talks | Dems seek briefing on Iranian cyber threats | Buttigieg loses cyber chief McConnell locks in schedule for start of impeachment trialMORE (D-Calif.), who was tapped by Pelosi to lead the Democrats arguments in the Senate trial.
Still, Democrats won a near-term victory on Wednesday, when McConnell who has been cold to the idea of calling any witnesses agreed to a rules package that leaves open the potential for new witnesses to appear. Anything less, Democrats have charged, would be a dereliction of the Senates duty.
Democrats voted largely along party-lines last month to impeach Trump on the two charges abuse of power and obstruction of Congress alleging that the administration dangled the promise of aid and a White House meeting as leverage for their investigation demands.
House Democrats charge that the White House then sought to obstruct their impeachment inquiry by blocking the testimony of current and former White House officials, while asserting absolute immunity over their testimony.
The OMB, however, is disputing the GAO opinion, arguing that the budget office used the apportionment authority to ensure taxpayer dollars are properly spent consistent with the President’s priorities and with the law.”
Trump administration officials have argued they were seeking to ensure Ukraine was properly fighting widespread corruption, despite the Pentagon already certifying at the time of the delay that Ukraine had met the requirements set by Congress and after the agency notified Congress of its intent to release the funds.
Still, a senior administration official in a statement called the GAO report an overreach, blasting the independent watchdog for getting involved in the media’s controversy of the day and pointing to what the official called GAO’s record of flip-flopping on past opinions.
In their rush to insert themselves in the impeachment narrative, maybe they’ll have to reverse their opinion again,” the official said.